Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Risk Assessment

Student did not submit assignment.

MAP-IT is not reflected in the assessment process.

Few MAP-IT aspects applied to the assessment process.

MAP-IT applied to the assessment process with missing
elements.

Clearly applied MAP- IT in the assessment process.

Student did not submit assignment

Lack of strengths identified.

Briefly mentioned the strengths.

Identified the strengths but without explanation.

Thoroughly described and analyzed the strengths linking with community in which aggregate lives.

Student did not submit assignment

Lack of weaknesses
identified.

Briefly mentioned the
weaknesses.

Identified the
weaknesses but without explanation.

Thoroughly described
and analyzed the weaknesses linking with community in which aggregate lives.

Student did not submit assignment.

Lack of description of
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted.

Briefly mentioned how
the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted.

Mentioned in detail
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted,
using the course textbook as a reference.

Thoroughly described
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted,
using the course textbook as a reference.

Student did not submit assignment.

No health risks
Identified.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate but no explanation included.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate
and explanation
included vaguely relating to the risk assessment.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate
and explanation
included clearly relating to the risk assessment.

Student did not submit assignment.

Cited one source and
it was not a journal article.

Cited two sources but
they were not journal articles.

Cited one source that
was a journal article.

Cited two journal
articles.

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Introduction is
present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a
clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches
the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Student did not submit assignment.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with
readability and comprehension

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with
readability and comprehension

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with
readability or comprehension

The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in
following the writer’s
logic.

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at APA format.

APA format is
attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Using APA format,
accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors
present are somewhat minor.

Using APA format,
accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.